<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush, Merkel, and the quickie neck rub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whosane.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/bush-merkel-and-the-quickie-neck-rub/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whosane.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/bush-merkel-and-the-quickie-neck-rub/</link>
	<description>“At 20 years of age the will reigns; at 30 the wit; at 40 the judgement.” - Benjamin Franklin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheBadLibrarian</title>
		<link>http://whosane.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/bush-merkel-and-the-quickie-neck-rub/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBadLibrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whosane.wordpress.com/?p=4#comment-40</guid>
		<description>He didn&#039;t do it to any of the male heads of state.  Not one.  Because it would have been viewed as an aggressive attempt at domination and patronage.  I think that&#039;s all that needs to be said to make a conclusion about his motivation.  Treating it as &#039;sexual&#039; harrassment clouds the issue: it was a harrassing powerplay, done because he could get away with it as the &#039;sexual&#039; aspect would cloud and divert debate.

I believe this motivation was unconscious, by the way: it&#039;s not as if he&#039;s smart enough to work it out beforehand, or to understand his own motivations.  Like most barely-evolved creatures, a lot of his functions are instinctive, not learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He didn&#8217;t do it to any of the male heads of state.  Not one.  Because it would have been viewed as an aggressive attempt at domination and patronage.  I think that&#8217;s all that needs to be said to make a conclusion about his motivation.  Treating it as &#8217;sexual&#8217; harrassment clouds the issue: it was a harrassing powerplay, done because he could get away with it as the &#8217;sexual&#8217; aspect would cloud and divert debate.</p>
<p>I believe this motivation was unconscious, by the way: it&#8217;s not as if he&#8217;s smart enough to work it out beforehand, or to understand his own motivations.  Like most barely-evolved creatures, a lot of his functions are instinctive, not learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
